My many thanks to absolutely everyone who answered my queries last 7 days about multifactor placement in the context of twin enrollment, and about the downstream consequences on grad faculty admissions of suboptimal grades gained in twin-enrollment applications.
My questions were being close to irrespective of whether any person knew of precise evidence on both of people. So considerably, it appears like each areas are ripe for research. Quite a few individuals wrote to share their own observations, which were rather steady with each other. But no person could position to a substantial empirical review. My guess is that the spread of twin enrollment is current adequate — at the very least at scale — that two confounding factors are in engage in: the relevance of certain investigation queries is only now becoming apparent, and establishments are acquiring earlier the early aspect of the finding out curve. That latter level indicates that even if we experienced fantastic facts from, say, pupils who took dual-enrollment classes in 2014 and just lately utilized to graduate educational institutions, individuals facts would replicate the point out of dual enrollment in 2014. Each large universities and schools are finding superior at it.
However, the term “data” is not the plural of “anecdote,” nor is it a synonym for “hunch.” It looks like there is some great and valuable function waiting to be accomplished.
Does everyone know of any group or condition faculties that have formed public/private partnerships (or a little something similar) to carry electrical-automobile charging stations to campus parking lots?
We don’t see a good deal of Teslas, but made use of Nissan Leafs (Leaves?) are pretty realistic. And given how a lot of our carbon technology arrives from transportation, and how reliant we are on learners and employees getting in a position to push to campus, it seems like it’s truly worth investigating.
I’m fairly taken with Richard Reeves’s latest piece on truthfulness. It is well value a study in itself, but if I experienced to boil it down, I’d pick this excerpt:
“Truth is empirical, but truthfulness is moral.”
By “truthfulness” he means something like fantastic-faith attempts to get to the truth of the matter. Those tries can include errors — “I could have sworn I left my keys here” — but that does not make people errors lies.
The essential distinction is how anyone responds when a phony assertion is corrected. Someone who is truthful will take the correction, even if potentially with some grumbling.
In my darker times, I speculate in some cases if the staff sports activities side of our politics overrides truthfulness. When the position is to win fairly than to get it correct, then reality results in being optional. But after real truth is optional, reasoned debate is pointless. There is no authentic discussion to be experienced with someone who feels entitled to make up information on the location in company of some other purpose.
That’s barely a new perception, of class. Socrates experienced minimal use for the sophists, who utilized rhetorical ability in frankly instrumental methods. (“Sophistry” carries that older indicating, while the word is also at the root of “sophisticated.”) Admittedly, he also did not imagine substantially of most people’s urge for food for truthfulness as a substitute, he imagined that the best we could hope for with most people today was a “noble lie.” That, too, to some degree narrows the scope of discussion.
It is an previous saw that politics is war by other suggests. Politics depends on, among the other matters, a belief that conversing with other individuals is helpful. If we lose that belief, then conflict will by necessity be settled in much more simple approaches. An alarming part of the globe is dwelling that truth of the matter ideal now. I’d dislike to see us relearn it the challenging way.